Why a Style Guide for AI-Assisted Content
Most content teams use AI tools daily in 2026. Without a style guide, the output varies wildly by writer, drifts from brand voice, and gets cited (or mis-cited) by AI assistants in unpredictable ways. A style guide tightens the voice, makes the workflow auditable, and improves both human readability and AI citation rate.
Section 1: Voice and Tone
- Active voice over passive. "Stripe shipped X" beats "X was shipped by Stripe."
- Specific over generic. Cite a number, a date, a named person instead of "many", "recently", "experts".
- Plain over corporate. "We disagree with this approach" beats "We have concerns regarding the proposed methodology."
- Confident over hedged. State conclusions; explain uncertainty separately rather than burying both in one sentence.
- No em-dashes in published prose; use commas, periods, or parentheses.
Section 2: Structure Standards
- Lead with the answer. The first sentence of any explainer should contain the key claim, not the setup.
- Paragraphs 2-4 sentences. Longer paragraphs hurt both reader retention and AI passage extraction.
- One idea per heading. H2 headings should be answerable as standalone questions.
- Numbers and dates in figures, not words ("12 million" not "twelve million"; "May 15, 2026" not "the fifteenth of May, twenty twenty-six").
- Named entities consistent. Same product name spelled the same way every time.
Section 3: AI Tool Usage
- Drafting: Approved tools may be used for outlines and first drafts. Always with an explicit prompt brief from a named editor.
- Editing: AI tools may be used for line editing, grammar, and structural suggestions. Final voice and structure decisions stay with the human writer.
- Fact-checking: AI tools may surface candidate facts and citations but cannot be the sole source. Every published fact must be verified against a primary source.
- Research: AI tools may be used for background research. Citations to AI-summarised content must point to the underlying primary source, not the AI assistant.
- Image generation: Permitted with named human review and watermark / disclosure.
Section 4: Citation and Sourcing
- Every numerical claim has a source link.
- Sources are primary where possible (filings, official statistics, scientific papers).
- AI-assistant summaries are not citable sources; the underlying primary source is.
- Citation links open in a new tab with
rel="noopener noreferrer". - Dated claims include the date the figure was sourced.
Section 5: Disclosure
- Substantive AI contribution to a piece is disclosed at the top of the article.
- AI-generated images are labelled in the caption with the model used.
- AI-translated content is labelled in the top metadata and via Schema.org markup.
- The site has a publicly accessible AI use policy linked from every article footer.
Section 6: Quality Bar
- Every published article has a named editor who is accountable for its accuracy.
- Every published article passes a 5-point quality check: structure, voice, citations, accuracy, AI disclosure.
- Articles flagged by readers for factual errors are corrected within 48 hours.
- Articles are reviewed for currency at 90 days and 365 days post-publication.
Section 7: Schema and Metadata
- Every article carries Article schema with author, datePublished, dateModified.
- Articles with FAQs include FAQPage schema.
- How-to articles include HowTo schema.
- Featured images have descriptive alt text and license attribution.
- Article URLs are stable; we do not redirect or rename URLs once published.
Section 8: Style Tics to Avoid
- "In today's fast-paced world"
- "It is important to note that"
- "Whether you are X or Y, this article will Z"
- "Let's dive in"
- "In this article we will explore"
- "The bottom line is"
- Closing rhetorical questions ("So what does this mean for you?")
- Filler intensifiers ("very", "really", "actually") without earning them